(Positive point)
A.O.Scott,
A.O.Scott,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/movies/24trut.html?_r=1&ex=1180065600&en=42220907b0fd919b&ei=5083&partner=Rotten%20Tomatoes
says that:
* Such a film has never been made before and it talks about the danger of climate changes.
* The film is not about Al Gore, but it considers the climate changes and global warming.
* The photographs of temperature increase and the rate of carbon-dioxide emissions were horrible and shocking.
* The ice melting images and the expected water increases in the coastal areas is a worrying matter.
(Negative point)
Tony Medley, http://www.tonymedley.com/2006/An_Inconvenient_Truth.htm
says that:
* The film is totally rubbish science and Al Gore is trying to be a responsible man towards the climate changes.
* Al Gore in this film is very kind, has lots of knowledge and gets respect from the audience. However in 2000 Al Gore was angry and not kind.
* There is no proof that man is actively causing global warming.
* The film talks about Gore’s personal life and it is not connected with the subject of the film.
(Opinion)
I agree with Scott that such a film has never been made before and it talks about the danger of climate changes because it is the first film I have seen which talks about the global warming. The film focuses on the climate changes in the world. However I disagree with Tony Medley that the film is rubbish science because the film shows the reality of the climate changes around the world. In addition the climate has changed in many countries around the world.
says that:
* Such a film has never been made before and it talks about the danger of climate changes.
* The film is not about Al Gore, but it considers the climate changes and global warming.
* The photographs of temperature increase and the rate of carbon-dioxide emissions were horrible and shocking.
* The ice melting images and the expected water increases in the coastal areas is a worrying matter.
(Negative point)
Tony Medley, http://www.tonymedley.com/2006/An_Inconvenient_Truth.htm
says that:
* The film is totally rubbish science and Al Gore is trying to be a responsible man towards the climate changes.
* Al Gore in this film is very kind, has lots of knowledge and gets respect from the audience. However in 2000 Al Gore was angry and not kind.
* There is no proof that man is actively causing global warming.
* The film talks about Gore’s personal life and it is not connected with the subject of the film.
(Opinion)
I agree with Scott that such a film has never been made before and it talks about the danger of climate changes because it is the first film I have seen which talks about the global warming. The film focuses on the climate changes in the world. However I disagree with Tony Medley that the film is rubbish science because the film shows the reality of the climate changes around the world. In addition the climate has changed in many countries around the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment